DORISEA-Workshop
Religion, Place and Modernity in East and Southeast Asia
Comparative Perspectives on the Placing of Religion in the Context of Modernity
September 19-22, 2012
University of Goettingen, Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology
Convenor: Michael Dickhardt
The concept of secularization has been thoroughly criticized on conceptual, historical and empirical grounds. This critique led to a new understanding of the relationship between religion and modernity. It became clear that religion in modernity cannot be understood as an antithesis to modernity or as a pre-modern survival, which has a function in modernity as private shelter against the impositions of modern life or as an object of educational or consumption value, but not as a factor actively shaping modernity. Rather, religion appears more and more to be a genuinely modern phenomena existing in modernity, not beside or against or in spite of it. From a Western perspective, this concept of religion in modernity implies that religion and modernity are conceived as mutually interpenetrated and constituted. But is this concept of religion in modernity useful in Asian contexts, too? Is “religion” being constituted conceptually and practically in similar ways in relation to “modernity”? Is “religion” rendered “modern” in a more than just a superficial sense, i.e., is religion an integrated part of those multiple projects we call „modern“ and which are aimed at autonomy, rationality and this-worldliness? Is “religion” a real mediator of “modernity”, appropriating “modern” practices and actively shaping “modernity”? Which are the consequences of such an appropriation of “modern” practices for “religion”? And which are the consequences of a “religious” mediation of modernity for “modernity” itself?
To answer these questions, we have to develop better understandings of the possibilities and limits of using the concepts of “religion“ and “modernity“ in Asian contexts and how “religion“ and „modernity“ are articulated and related in conceptual and practical ways. Starting from a concept of “religion” several dimensions of inquiry emerge, as for example theological discourses, ritual practices, systems of belief and meanings, spiritual experiences or the social, political and economic structures and involvements of religious communities. To bring together the different dimensions of inquiry within one workshop, the places of religions will be used as the common focus. To use the concept of place is, on the one hand, theoretically challenging because it allows us to discuss of different forms of spatial articulations of religion and modernity in culturally defined localities. On the other hand, to use the concept of place is ethnographically inspiring in its capacity to relate “religion” and “modernity” in and through the spatially articulated practices of the actors in places as physical structures, on their virtual, spiritual and corporeal paths between places in local, regional, national, transnational and global dimensions and in practically referring to places as parts of their imagination, their cosmological structures or their metaphorical relations.
The concept of religious places implied in this attempt to define a common focus for a workshop is a concept which does not reduce religious places to sacred places in the narrow sense of bounded meaningful structures within religious symbolisms. The critique of spatiality in the vein of authors such as Henri Lefebvre, Akhil Gupta, James Ferguson, David Harvey or Arjun Appadurai and concepts formulated within these discourses such as the production of space, globalization, deterritorialization / reterritorialization or ethnoscapes made clear that places cannot be reduced to themselves. Rather, places have to be understood within complex practices of positioning, spatializing, interrelating and imagining. Places are not just given as bounded entities. They are brought into existence within complex relations to other places as parts of encompassing spatialities of local, national, transnational, regional and global scopes, in the processes of being related through the virtual, spiritual and corporeal paths of the actors and in their function as intersection and as point of reference of different actors and structural principles of socio-cultural praxis. It is this complex relationality of places which renders them relevant for a comparative attempt to approach the relation between “religion” and “modernity”. Religious practices are forming their places in specific ways through practices of sacralizing, ritual and ascription of meaning. However, places such as temples, churches, shrines or abodes of spirits are being shaped and rendered meaningful not only in relation religious meanings, practices and spatialities alone. The fundamental relationality of place implies that other, not primarily religious practical contexts as well as encompassing structures of spatiality not reducible to religious dimensions alone are constitutive for religious places being positioned, spatialized, interrelated and imagined. And often it is exactly through these multidimensional practical and spatial contexts that “modernity” is mediated to “religion”: “modern” structures of economy, society, urbanity, state, administration and planning, involvement in tourism, interconnectedness through “modern” technologies of transport and communication, embeddedness in local, national and global discourses of commemoration, identity and legitimization, confrontation with new concepts of personality and world – and many more. Consequently, the workshop will approach the relation between religion and modernity through the discussion of such processes of placing and spatializing of religious practices in relation to practices and spatialities conditioned by modernity. And using places as a focus for such an approach implies to reflect on the complex relationality of places brought about through the paths and referential practices of the actors within local, national, transnational, regional and global structures.
It is planned to start the workshop with two keynote lectures on „Religion and Place in East and Southeast Asia” and “Religion, Modernity and Urbanity in East and Southeast Asia”. After that, the workshop will comprise sessions arranged around three major issues:
Practices of modernity shape and form religious places:
There are a lot of so-called modern practices which are involved in shaping and using religious places, e.g., the bureaucratic administration and control of space, the commodification of rituals and sacred places, the commercial exploitation through tourism or the interpretation of religious places as cultural heritage or historical monument or as part of transnational or diasporic constructions of spirituality and identity. Such practices are influencing the meaning, the accessibility and the practical utilization of these places and render modernity perceptible and disposable. How does modernity form religion in and through the places these practices of modernity are articulated in?
Religious places are present in spatialities of modernity:
Modern structures such as the bureaucratic national state, capitalism or transnationally structured diasporic communities have powerfully shaped and produced their own forms of spatiality and the places present in these spatialities. However, part of these spatialities are also religious places: shrines used to ask for success in the capitalistic market, sites of mass production of sacred objects conceived of as the first step towards sacralization of these objects, temples, used for ritual, prayer and devotion, which are also part of the economy of tourism or diasporic networks. How is religion present in the spatialities of modernity? What does the presence of religious places in modern spatialities mean for modernity and religion?
Modern urbanity and religious praxis:
Contemporary cities appear in many ways as the spatial articulation of modernity par excellence. However, modern urbanity is more than a form of physical space. It is also a bundle of specific social, political, economic and cultural forms. How does such a complex bundle of modern forms condition religious practices and how do religious practices condition the modern cities in Asia?
Convenor
Michael Dickhardt (University of Goettingen) |
Keynote Speakers
Goh Beng Lan (National University of Singapore) Religion, Nation and Modernity in Southeast Asia: Some Thoughts on the Power of the Uncanny |
Peter van der Veer (MPI Goettingen) Concepts of Space in the New Geography of Asia |
Speakers
01 | Bénédicte Brac de la Perrière (Centre Asie du Sud-Est, Paris) How the Lady of Bottataung was Displaced from the Inside to the Outside of the Buddhist Sanctuary [Burma] |
02 | Nikolas Broy (University of Goettingen) Religion in the History of Modern East Asia |
03 | Chan Yuk Wah (City University of Hong Kong) Death Management and the Space of the Dead in Urban Hong Kong |
04 | Michael Dickhardt (University of Goettingen) Religion, Place and Modernity in Urban Vietnam |
05 | Đinh Hồng Hải (Vietnamese Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi) Symbolism in the New Era of Buddhism: A Study in the Change of Maitreya from Buddhist Texts to Social Facts of Modernity in Vietnam |
06 | Volker Gottowik (University of Heidelberg) In Search of Holy Water: A Hindu Pilgrimage to Mount Rinjani in Lombok, Indonesia |
07 | Weishan Huang (MPI Goettingen) Small by Design: City, Surveillance, and Doing Religion |
08 | Patrice Ladwig (MPI for Social Anthropology, Halle) Spatializing the dhamma. The Buddhification of Ethnic Minorities and the Debris of Socialist Modernity in Southern Laos |
09 | Andrea Lauser (University of Goettingen) Wealth, Merit-making and Pilgrimages between Religious Resurgence and Tourism in Contemporary Vietnam |
10 | Jovan Maud (University of Goettingen) New Routes for the Venerable Ancestor: Growth Triangles, Tourism, and the Emergence of a Sacred Landscape in the Thai-Malay Borderland |
11 | Ngô Thi Thanh Tâm (MPI Goettingen) The Kings’ Edicts: Crowning and Dethroning Gods and Goddesses in a Sino-Vietnamese Border Town [Lào Cai, Vietnam] |
12 | Michael Prager (University of Muenster) De-localizing the Sacred: From Local Ancestors to Translocal Islam in Indonesia |
13 | Axel Schneider (University of Goettingen) From "moral transformation" (jiao) to "religion" (zongjiao) |
14 | Clemens Six (University of Groningen) Re-locating Religion within the Modern Secular: Comparative Remarks on Early Post-colonial India, Indonesia and Singapore |
15 | Martin Slama (Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna) Islamic Schools as Sites of Modern (Trans)Localities. Examples from the Hadhrami Diaspora in Indonesia |
16 | Paul Sorrentino (Université Paris Descartes, Paris) Social, Political and Biographical Dynamics around the Sites of Soul-calling Rituals in Vietnam |
17 | Alexander Soucy (St. Mary’s University, Nova Scotia, Canada) Altered Space for a New Zen in Vietnam |
18 | Sing Suwannakij (University of Copenhagen) Sight and Site: Religiosity and Scientificity in Nineteenth-century Siam |
19 | Yeoh Seng-Guan (Monash University Malaysia) Religious Praxis, Modernity and Non-Modernity in Kuala Lumpur |
A printable PDF-file of the program is available here...
Preliminary time table
Wednesday, 19.09.2012
16:00 | Arrival, city tour and informal get-together |
Thursday, 20.09.2012
10:00 | Welcome |
10:30 |
Keynote I: Peter van der Veer (MPI MMG Goettingen) |
11:30 | Coffee |
11:45 |
Keynote II: Goh Beng-Lan (National University of Singapore) |
12:45 | Lunch |
14:00 |
Panel 1: Concepts of Religion in Asian Modernity Nikolas Broy (University of Goettingen) Axel Schneider (University of Goettingen) Clemens Six (University of Groningen) |
16:00 | Coffee |
16:30 |
Panel 2: Religious Places and Practices of Modernity I Bénédicte Brac de la Perrière (Centre Asie du Sud-Est, Paris) Volker Gottowik (University of Heidelberg) Michael Prager (University of Muenster) |
18:30 | End of conference day 1 |
Friday, 21.09.2012
09:00 |
Panel 2: Religious Places and Practices of Modernity II Đinh Hồng Hải (Vietnamese Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi) Paul Sorrentino (Université Paris Descartes, Paris) Andrea Lauser (University of Goettingen) |
11:00 | Coffee |
11:30 |
Panel 3: Religious Places and Modern Spatialities I Ngô Thi Thanh Tâm (MPI MMG Goettingen) Alexander Soucy (St. Mary’s University, Nova Scotia, Canada) |
13:00 | Lunch |
14:30 |
Panel 3: Religious Places and Modern Spatialities II Patrice Ladwig (MPI for Social Anthropology, Halle) Jovan Maud (University of Goettingen) Martin Slama (Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna) |
16:30 | Coffee |
17:00 |
Panel 4: Religious Places and Urbanity I Sing Suwannakij (University of Copenhagen) Yeoh Seng-Guan (Monash University Malaysia) |
18:30 | End of conference day 2 |
20:00 | Conference dinner |
Saturday, 22.09.2012
09:00 |
Panel 4: Religious Places and Urbanity II Michael Dickhardt (University of Goettingen) Weishan Huang (MPI MMG Goettingen) Chan Yuk Wah (City University of Hong Kong) |
10:45 | Coffee |
11:00 | Wrap-up session and conclusion. Roundtable on publication. |
13:00 | End of Conference |
Practical Information for Guests
Registration
The workshop is open to a limited number of guests. Please register via [email protected] until September 16th, 2013. The registration fee for guests is 40€ (20€/single day) and students 20€ (10€/single day) and includes beverages and lunch.
Workshop Venue
The workshop venue is the historical Holborn’sches Haus in the middle of Goettingen, which dates back to the year 1266 – but do not worry, is has been renovated since. You can have a look at the venue via this (unfortunately German-only) website, which also provides a map.
Accommodation
As the workshop competes with the International Commercial Vehicles Fair in Hannover for hotel rooms, we advise you to book your room early. The municipal Tourist Office offers a variety of accommodation options, which can be booked via their website. In close proximity to the conference venue are Hotel Central, Hotel Stadt Hannover and Hotel Eden.
A printable PDF-file containing all abstracts is available here...
Bénédicte Brac de la Perrière (Centre Asie du Sud-Est, Paris)
In this paper, I will examine Burmese delineations of different religious « paths » through contestation over the understanding of “religion”. How the concept of “religion” was appropriated under the colonial rule in the orientalist context is now well documented. In Burma*, this appropriation has caused the ordering of social life according to the opposition of in worldly ways to out worldly ways to be overshadowed by a new interrogation about what is truly “religious”. Through the presentation of the case of the Lady of Bottataung, I will argue that these processes are still operating in the evolution of the practices of different specialists according to the overall situation. The Lady is the guardian spirit of the Bottataung pagoda in Yangon whose shrine was displaced from inside to outside the Buddhist sanctuary, while she gained considerable fame among new urban public. Relative positions of the different agents of her cult and of her ousting of the pagoda space will be examined as expressions of the multivocal dimension of Burmese religion.
*See Houtman and Kirichienko, for the history of the Burmese appropriation of the concept “religion”.
Nikolas Broy (University of Goettingen)
This paper will examine how the western concept of “religion” has been transferred, discussed, and accommodated in Japan, China, and Korea since their modernization and westernization began in the mid 19th century. This concept, itself a 19th century western creation with deep Protestant implications, the things it entails, and its relationship to a modern and allegedly “secular” state came to be a matter of debate which still has not ended yet. Even though “religion” came to be represented with the same Chinese characters in all three countries, it is not only their pronunciation as shūkyō, zongjiao and chonggyo that differs quite a lot. This paper will examine the history of “religion” in three steps: First, it will trace the discourses that shaped the concept of “religion” and helped to popularize it within their respective societies. Second, it will show the alterations of the religious fields that have been triggered by it. Finally, it will discuss the nature of these concepts in relation to the course of the western conception of “religion” and the “secular”.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Chan Yuk Wah (City University of Hong Kong)
One of the most observable changes in death management among the Chinese population is the popularization of cremation. Since the early 1980s, more Hong Kong dead bodies were treated with cremation than burial. In recent years, over 90% of the deceased were cremated. Cremation has effectively reduced the bulk of the deceased and helped solve the problem of limited graveyard spaces during the 1980s and 1990s. However, after a few decades, the public concern has been shifted to the shortage of columbarium for the interment of human ashes. While the general public has often urged Hong Kong government to supply more columbarium niches, many will not endorse the idea of placing new columbaria inside their own living areas. Social debates concerning death space became hot when members of the district councils, representing their voters, blamed the government for not having a comprehensive policy for keeping the remains of the dead. The government on the other hand claimed that it could do nothing if the public continued to reject building new housing for the dead in their districts.
The difference between the so-called yin space (for the passed away) and yang space (for the living) has often been used to justify for the objections to building columbarium near residential areas. This paper traces some of the most important changes concerning death management in urban Hong Kong in the past few decades. While the place of the dead may mean graveyard and columbarium, death space often transgresses geographical sites and creates spaces of contestations in people’s living environment and imagination. The paper will discuss the evolvement of space arrangement and the modern discourse of superstition in death management. It argues that the inter-mixing and segregation of the yin and yang spaces have become part of the politics of space in HK, which also reveals an intriguingly re-enchanted Chinese population in a highly urbanized and modernized city.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Michael Dickhardt (University of Goettingen)
The recent ethnography on religion in Vietnam shows many examples of religious practices being a genuine part of modernity and of multiple ways to articulate and shape modernity in and through religious practices. To understand the relationship between modernity and religion in Vietnam means to understand this multiplicity. An important aspect of this multiplicity is the ensemble of the religious forms of Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, Religion of the Mother Goddesses and the beliefs and rituals related to tutelary gods, local spirits, heroes and ancestors. These religious forms can be understood in various respects as distinct and as having own dynamics and own ways of being related to and affected by modernity. However, they are brought into meaningful relations and interactions by the practices of actors. But this does not result in a common doctrinal core or in a single religious totality. Rather, the actors bring about a distinctive religious sphere characterized by its multiplicity. In order to empirically and conceptually approach this specific form of religious multiplicity and its multiple relations to modernity, I suggest to focus on religious places such as pagodas (chùa), temples (đền and phủ) or communal houses (đình) in urban contexts of Hanoi. As these places bring together different religious forms and various religious and non-religious practices, they become fields of conjunction, disjunction and contestation of religious forms in which the actors articulate modernity, religious beliefs, localized practices as well as translocal relationality and unleash dynamics of religion characterized by tensions between continuity and change, inclusion and exclusion and modulation and conversion. This paper argues that the empirical study of urban religious places as places of a religious multiplicity offers a major contribution to the understanding of modernity in Vietnam.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Dinh Hong Hai (Vietnamese Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi)
Maitreya is one of the most important idol of Buddhism, but in the context of economic boom in Vietnam after ‘doi moi’ (innovation), Maitreya also appears as a kind of God of Wealth and even as decorative objects. This idol has gone beyond the scope of Buddhism to become a symbol of lucky and wealth in contemporary religion in Vietnam. The current synthesis between Buddhism and local belief has introduced great complexity in the representation of Maitreya: It is represented as both the Future Buddha and as Savior. It both plays an important role in Mahayana Buddhism and God of Wealth (Thần Tài) in folk belief. Therefore, to distinguish between the Buddhist deity Maitreya and the new God of Wealth of modernity in Vietnam, we need to examine the new cultural factors that have combined to produce these various representations beside the Buddhist texts. It’s a transformation that goes beyond the general rules of existing religions. For this reason, this research will not classify the new Maitreya cult in Buddhism but will label it “amoral cult” of modernity in Vietnam. Thus, to study Maitreya in modern society, we need to know the cultural space and religious places of the new idol due to the ‘new incarnation’ of Maitreya and considering the religious change of modernity in Vietnam.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Volker Gottowik (University of Heidelberg)
Every year at the beginning of the rainy season, the active volcano Mount Rinjani attracts some hundred Hindu-Balinese pilgrims, who live in the western part of Lombok or arrive from the neighboring island of Bali. In the course of an altogether six-day journey, these pilgrims trek to the crater lake Segara Anak, where they pray for sufficient rain, while a small delegation climbs the peak of Mount Rinjani (3700m) to sacrifice to the Hindu gods and fetch holy water. In this context, a local deity, Dewi Anjani, receives special veneration from precious offerings dropped into the middle of the lake. The spatial proximity to the gods, indicated through the densification of essential elements like fire, water and smoke, requires a particular behavioral code at the pilgrimage site, which goes beyond dress and food. Despite the explicit removal of the pilgrims from the conveniences of modern life, this behavioral code does not cover the use of modern technologies at the lake. Loudspeakers, computers, mobile phones etc. find their way to the pilgrimage site and cut across the expectations of the western researcher who has prepared himself for silent meditations in the midst of nature. However, according to the Hindu-Balinese pilgrims, this technical equipment does not violate the dignity of the place, but is rather well integrated into the ritual process. Against this background, the focus of this paper is on local concepts of space and spirituality which allow the pilgrims to appropriate achievements of modernity without challenging their overall ambitions, i.e. to be close to the Gods and to receive holy water.
Weishan Huang (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Goettingen)
The author is interested in looking at religious groups as a location for discussion and critique in a censorial society in China. This paper will take the approach of the “ecological model” in field research in a highly censorial and increasingly pluralistic city, Shanghai. Shanghai has experienced large scale social changes since the late 1980s. It is critical to understand how socio-structural challenges, such as immigration, affect faith-based groups within the frame of urban aspirations. In this paper, the adaptation of faith-based groups to their political environments will be the primarily focus. Due to governmental restriction in province-level municipalities, religious practices are invisible in public spaces but are revitalizing in private spaces in major Chinese cities. The roles urban religious institutions play in adapting to city regulations are especially pressing for faith groups. My research discovered, first, under the political surveillance in city, religious groups are not passively enduring the impact of political control, but also actively engaging in organizational development. Secondly, religious groups can be considered a location which creates a social space for grassroots education and, therefore, develops a more creative and fluid “popular politics” in society, which offers a critique to a highly regulated society.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Patrice Ladwig (Max-Planck-Institute for Social Anthropology)
Ethnic minorities in Laos have endured various forms of internal and external colonialism that positioned them spatially and culturally at the margins of lowland society. Although the communist revolution in 1975 radically altered their former social status as ‘slaves’ (kha) and introduced an ambivalent politics of recognition, Laos has since the 1990s undergone an increasing process of Buddhification and Laotization. Certain elements of Buddhism – and with that ethnic Lao culture - are now again promoted as national culture. These aspects of Buddhism not only pervade political ritual, but increasingly also everyday morality and expected standards of behavior and etiquette. After the decline of the new socialist man, state agents now use Buddhism to cover up the debris of the socialist project.
This presentation follows processes of Buddhification in the South of Laos, specifically Attapeu province. Taking as an example the slow, but constant spread of Buddhism in the recent decade among Mon-Khmer groups such as the Oy and the Cheng, I specifically examine how this process spatializes Buddhism, its teachings (dhamma) and rituals by drawing minorities increasingly into the religious and social life-worlds of the ethnic lowland Lao. This spatialization works on a multitude of levels linking the promotion of national culture, ideas of modernity and civilization, resettlement to the lowlands and general development politics. Through the participation in religious and secular state rituals, ordination as a novice or monk, the learning of Lao religious language and bodily practices, minorities are supposed to acquire the ‘national culture’ in the temple, which thereby becomes a mediator of modernity. Although this Buddhification is far from complete and the Oy and the Cheng also make creative use of the options created by this process, the pressure of the state authorities and their resettlement into the vicinity of ethnic Lao has lead to unprecedented religious change.
[The paper can be dowloaded here...]
Andrea Lauser (University of Goettingen)
Yen Tu, a well known “Sacred Mountain” in the northeastern part of Vietnam is surrounded by primeval forest with plentiful and diversified flora. The attribution of sacred or mystical qualities to mount Yen Tu has a long tradition. Thus, Yen Tu provides a symbol of cosmic order in Vietnamese Taoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism. Since the open door politics of Vietnam's government this pilgrimage center is given official recognition from the Ministry of Culture as a national cultural heritage site. And recently - through the construction of a cable car system carrying pilgrims (and tourists) to the top - Yen Tu is also becoming one of the ‘must to do’ of global “pilgrim-tourists” (with more than 2 million travelers in 2009). Looking at the pilgrimage site as a multidimensional arena the paper will focus on the negotiation of agendas between wealth, merit-making and political certification of culture and heritage in contemporary Vietnam.
Jovan Maud (University of Goettingen)
In southern Thailand one of the most prominent sacred presences in the landscape is that of Luang Pho Thuat, a renowned Buddhist monk who is supposed to have lived and wandered in the region during the seventeenth century CE. Although an ostensibly ancient figure, knowledge of Luang Pho Thuat has emerged since the 1950s through the actions of a variety of authoritative intermediaries who have "rediscovered" his presence in the landscape. Through a range of techniques ranging from "traditional" visions and mediumship to the "modern" historiography, the sacred landscape associated with this ancient monk has not been static but has emerged over time through the production of different forms of authoritative knowledge. Furthermore, these ongoing excavations of the pre-modern past have been intertwined with political and economic processes in the modern South, including the symbolic consolidation of the Thai nation-state and the development of pilgrimage and religious tourism.
The stories and sites associated with Luang Pho Thuat's travels are not confined to the Thai nation-state, however, but also inscribe pathways that connect southern Thailand with northern Malaysia. But compared to southern Thailand, the Malaysian sites have remained relatively undeveloped, largely invisible to all but the most knowledgeable. Recently, however, there have been attempts to develop the northern Malaysian sites. Within the framework of the Indonesia Malaysia Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT), efforts are underway to develop the ancestral wanderings of the saint as one of several cross-border "cultural routes" designed to promote tourism and economic development in the borderland region. To this end new instances of scholarship, mediumship, and entrepreneurship have been recruited to excavate the presence of the saint and confer new sanctity, and legibility, to the landscape.
This paper considers these latest elaborations of the sacred geography associated with Luang Pho Thuat, and in particular the convergence of transnational governance embodied in the Growth Triangle, with new efforts to imagine the borderland as a shared cultural space in which a Buddhist past is evoked and re-presented. In this way the paper shows place-making and production of the sacred to be ongoing, dynamic practices inseparable from contemporary political and economic realities, even as they are constructed, and experienced, as the rediscovery of premodern presences inherent in the landscape itself.
Ngô Thi Thanh Tâm (Post-doctoral Fellow, MPI, Goettingen)
On 17 February 1979, a bloody war between Vietnam and China erupted which turned various Vietnamese border towns into ghostly places with only military occupation in the decade to come. Lao Cai is one of such towns. Yet, the disrupting experience of war and military occupation is not entirely new to Lao Cai. It had been long known as a trading post which was constantly fought over by the Chinese, Vietnamese, as well as by a number of ethnic groups, and since the second half of the 19th century, by the French. Today, more than 30 years after the 1979 war, Lao Cai prospers thanks to the large volume of trade with China, but the disrupting impact and painful memory of this war continue to haunt the town and the daily experiences of its residents, both human and gods. The paper focuses on the narratives of local residents about what they record as the fates of several gods and goddess, who reigned at two temples, Den Thuong (Father Temple) and Den Mau (Mother Temple), right next to the borderline, during and after the militarization of the town. It attempts to conceptualize the processes in which, in geopolitical borderland, not only the life of men but also that of gods and goddesses are all at the mercy of various nationalist and ethnic forces.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Michael Prager (University of Muenster)
Modernist Islam as advocated by a variety of reformist groups is striving for a return to an "authentic" form of Islam, an Islam that has been purified from its culture-specific and local "contaminations". In Indonesia, the growing impact of modernist Islam, both in urban and rural contexts, has given rise to a religious dynamics by which the cosmological systems of local societies have been affected to a large extent. The indigenous cosmological systems of Indonesian societies were often centred around ideas and ritual actions acknowledging the importance of local ancestors and other spiritual beings who were thought to form part of an extensive network of socio-cosmological relationships. Different categories of spirits were considered to mark various types of social, political, and territorial/spatial boundaries.
By drawing on ethnographic data collected in Bima and Eastern Java and by taking additional comparative data from other Indonesian regions into account, I shall focus on the way in which modernist Islam - as an ideology and religious praxis - tends to delocalize religion by declaring local traditions of religious knowledge as irrelevant, thereby relocating the sacred to another, more abstract, domain, and by attaching the individual to a translocal intangible community of believers (umma). By discussing these and other important religious changes, I shall scrutinize the major ontological transformations brought about by modernist Islam, particularly with regard to the conceptualization of social and ritual space.
Axel Schneider (University of Goettingen)
In this paper I trace late 19th century, early 20th century attempts at adapting Confucianism to Western notions of religion, thereby radically transforming the concept of "self-cultivation" that was so central for China's spiritual-ethical tradition. Starting with Kang Youwei's Confucian religion during the 1890s reform movement, I pursue this development down to the 1920s Confucian church movement and down to the KMT's attempts during the 1930s at using a transformed and traditionalized Confucianism for its political purposes, which in that respect are not much different from what the CCP is trying to achieve with its version of harmonious society ever since the late 1990s.
Clemens Six (University of Groningen)
If one agrees with Talal Asad that “any discipline that seeks to understand ‘religion’ must also try to understand its other”, i.e. the secular, a discussion on dynamics of religion in modern Southeast Asia ought to include a debate on how the religious and the secular mutually constituted and thereby transformed each other in the context of modernisation.
My paper discusses different processes of re-locating the religious within early post-colonial nation-building from a comparative perspective: India, Indonesia and Singapore have realised rather different ideas of a “secular” state after colonialism and have thus developed different strategies to locate the religious within their specific regimes of modernized religious pluralism. This re-location of religion concerned on the one hand spatial strategies of identifying, authorizing and re-locating places of worship through the post-colonial state but also strategies of social re-location, whereby the “religiously neutral” state re-defined the location of religion in society to limit and at the same time make use of its entitlement. The formation of the “secular” state and the re-location of religion shall thereby be understood as a power-driven process of mutual constitution and emancipation.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Martin Slama (Institute for Social Anthropology, Austrian Academy of Sciences)
A central feature of Indonesian Islamic organisations is that their schools, forming networks across the archipelago, contribute to the (trans)local articulations of both religiosity and modernity in many parts of the country. The paper is concerned with a particular case of such articulations, i.e. the one of Al-Khairaat, an Islamic organisation founded by Sayyid Idrus Al-Jufri who migrated from the Hadhramaut (located in today’s Republic of Yemen) to the then Netherlands East Indies where he settled in Palu (Central Sulawesi) and established the first Al-Khairaat school in the year 1930. Sayyid Idrus regularly travelled the region and encouraged male youth to come to Palu, offering them education free of charge at the Al-Khairaat madrasah. As a consequence, Al-Khairaat graduates opened schools in their home towns modelled on the Palu example. This paved the way for an impressive growth of Al-Khairaat which today constitutes north-eastern Indonesia’s biggest Islamic organisation. The paper examines the spatiality of Al-Khairaat through its networked schools by relating them to other Islamic sites, especially graves of Islamic figures that point to an earlier era of Islamic (trans-)localities. It focuses on how the schools became nodes in a network that shaped the conditions for being modern among Hadhramis as well as other Muslims in the region. And it particularly concentrates on the mobilities that invigorate the Al-Khairaat network and decisively inform the modern subjectivities of its members, men and women alike. Hence, the paper seeks to grasp Al-Khairaat as an example for the production of modern (trans)localities by means of a diaporic religiosity that is nevertheless rooted in particular places.
Alexander Soucy (St. Mary’s University, Nova Scotia, Canada)
Twentieth century events, with the Buddhist Revival (in response to colonialism), the war (and subsequent dispersal of the Vietnamese overseas), and Communist challenges, have brought about a renewed interest in Zen Buddhism in the twenty-first century. The southern Vietnamese monk, Thích Thanh Từ, has drawn on potent historical signifiers of Trần Nhân Tông and the only Vietnamese Zen lineage (Trúc Lâm) to create a new kind of Zen while simultaneously claiming identity with a nationalistic symbol from the past. In 1997 a local pagoda was taken over by Thích Thanh Từ's organisation and Zen missionaries from southern Vietnam have turned it into a major Zen center on the outskirts of Hanoi. This paper will explore how they have created and transformed the northern Buddhist space into something entirely new, reflecting more Modernist/Western/Global visions of Buddhism than local Vietnamese Buddhist understandings.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Sing Suwannakij (Department of History, Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen)
My paper will discuss the transformation of religiosity in the face of modernity from around mid-nineteenth century in Siam. Since my project’s major concern is sight and various visualities, I will examine how the 19th-century vision, in relation to space, perceived religiosity. This involves the process in which the traditional space of Traiphum (lit. three worlds) cosmography – where it was common that Buddha’s miracles, diverse heavenly beings and underworld creatures could appear to human sight, demonstrating the overlaps of vertical spaces – was shifted to a more horizontal vision which was focused on this-worldly affairs and geography. The scientifically informed ocularcentrism closed off the sky which was previously a repository for connections with other religious spaces. Instead, it prioritized physical eye and its extension via new scopic technologies, enhanced the micro and macro visions. This includes mapping areas in Bangkok (as well as other parts of the country) in response to urbanization as a result of opening up for the world market and colonial entanglement. The new spaces were concerned with resources, rather than religiosity, and measurement, rather than mythicization. Yet, religiosity did not disappear altogether: it underwent a complex transformation in relationship with modernity. It was increasingly turned into ‘things of the past’, its places of worship and objects into ‘antiquity and artifacts’ to be ‘discovered’ and deserved ‘historical investigation’. However, it also informed the present in new ways: rather than a simple continuity, the 19th-century Siamese state, identified religiosity in a very selective way, allowed only an officially approved version of it to thrive, and utilized it in the process of building absolutism and, later, nationalism.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]
Yeoh Seng-Guan (Monash University Malaysia)
Bruno Latour has once provocatively suggested that “we have never been modern” in juxtaposition to the genesis and promotion of Western science and scientific categories. How does this central insight bear out in the context of a post-colonial capital city of Kuala Lumpur, entangled in global modernizing flows and state-driven developmental aspirations? This essay examines some of the present day conundrums of everyday religion as practiced in ethno-religiously pluralist Malaysia. I argue that part of the contemporary “problem” is existential and arises from the cultural complexity of everyday inter-cultural encounters increasingly premised on the primacy of Islam as a hegemonic imaginary of the country. A more formidable structuring trajectory, however, is the spatializing force of rational-bureaucratic and administrative coordinates that draw from the cultural logic of colonial-political interventions and academic distinctions between “magic”, “religion” and “science”.
[The paper can be downloaded here...]